6-month-old with bilateral profound hearing loss, no risk factors.
Q1
Identify the most likely diagnosis based on the clinical presentation and lab findings
Audiometry
Profound SNHL both ears
CMV PCR (saliva)
Negative
MRI IAC
Normal
CT Temporal Bone
Normal
✅ Model Answer:
• Diagnosis: Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss, most likely GJB2 (Connexin 26) mutation — bilateral profound SNHL, negative CMV PCR, normal MRI/CT, consanguineous parents suggesting autosomal recessive inheritance.
• Any other test: Genetic testing (GJB2, GJB6, SLC26A4, mtDNA mutations), ophthalmology exam (rule out Usher syndrome), ECG (rule out Jervell & Lange-Nielsen syndrome – prolonged QT), renal ultrasound (if syndromic suspected).
• What to do next: Hearing aid fitting (by 1 month post-diagnosis). Early intervention (Part C – speech therapy, audiology). Genetic counseling for family. Evaluate for cochlear implant candidacy (severe-profound SNHL).
• Follow-up plan: Serial audiometry q6-12 months. Monitor speech/language development. Family support, Deaf mentors. Annual ophthalmology, ECG, and audiology follow-up.
Q2
What is the genetic basis of GJB2-related hearing loss?
✅ Model Answer:
• GJB2 gene: Located on chromosome 13q12, encodes Connexin 26 protein.
• Connexin 26: Forms gap junctions in the cochlea, allowing potassium recycling in the inner ear (essential for hair cell function).
• Inheritance: Autosomal recessive (most common), autosomal dominant (rare).
• Prevalence: Most common cause of genetic SNHL (up to 50% of autosomal recessive SNHL).
• Mutation: 35delG is the most common mutation (carrier frequency 1 in 35 in Caucasians).
• Phenotype: Usually bilateral, symmetric, severe to profound SNHL, non-progressive, no inner ear malformations.
Q3
What are the risk factors for sensorineural hearing loss in infants?
Q4
What is the role of CMV testing in infants with hearing loss?
✅ Model Answer:
• CMV is the most common non-genetic cause of congenital SNHL (20-30% of cases).
• Testing:
- Saliva/urine PCR: Sensitive, should be done within 3 weeks of life (congenital) or within 3 months for delayed-onset
- Dried blood spots: Can be tested retrospectively
• Why test?
- If positive and symptomatic (microcephaly, calcifications, hepatosplenomegaly) → valganciclovir treatment may improve hearing outcomes.
- Prognosis: CMV-related hearing loss can be progressive or delayed-onset → requires serial audiometry.
- Negative CMV + normal imaging + consanguinity → genetic cause more likely.
Q5
What is the difference between hearing aids and cochlear implants in the management of profound SNHL?
✅ Model Answer:
• Hearing aids:
- Indication: Mild to severe hearing loss (<70-90 dB HL)
- Mechanism: Amplifies sound, works best with residual hearing
- Benefits: Non-invasive, less expensive, good for speech perception in quiet
- Limitations: Limited benefit in severe-profound loss, may not help in noisy environments
• Cochlear implants:
- Indication: Severe to profound SNHL (>90 dB HL), especially if hearing aids provide limited benefit
- Mechanism: Bypasses damaged hair cells → directly stimulates the auditory nerve via electrode array
- Benefits: Better speech perception in noisy environments, improved language outcomes
- Limitations: Invasive (requires surgery), more expensive, requires rehabilitation
Q6
What is the importance of the 1-3-6 early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI) guidelines?
✅ Model Answer:
• 1-3-6 guidelines (JCIH):
- 1 month: Hearing screening completed by 1 month of age
- 3 months: Diagnosis confirmed by 3 months (ABR, OAE)
- 6 months: Intervention started by 6 months (hearing aids, early intervention)
• Why is this important?
- Critical period: Brain development for speech and language occurs in the first 3-5 years
- Outcomes: Early diagnosis and intervention (by 6 months) leads to age-appropriate language development
- Delays: Late diagnosis (>6-12 months) is associated with persistent language delays
- Equity: Reduces disparities in access to hearing services
Q7
What are the syndromic associations with SNHL that should be ruled out in this child?
Q8
What is the prognosis and long-term outcome for children with GJB2-related hearing loss?
✅ Model Answer:
• Prognosis:
- Excellent with early diagnosis and intervention (by 6 months)
- Non-progressive in most cases (but should be monitored)
- Hearing aids: Effective for mild-moderate loss; cochlear implant for severe-profound loss
- Speech/language: Age-appropriate development possible with early intervention
• Long-term outcomes:
- Educational: Mainstream schooling possible with appropriate support
- Communication: Spoken language, sign language, or both based on family choice
- Quality of life: Good with family support, Deaf community involvement
- Genetic counseling: 25% recurrence risk for future siblings (autosomal recessive).
- No other medical complications (nonsyndromic).
⚠️ Key Concept: Genetic SNHL (GJB2)
• Profound SNHL + consanguinity + negative CMV + normal imaging = GJB2 until proven otherwise.
• Most common cause of autosomal recessive nonsyndromic SNHL.
• Diagnosis: Genetic testing (GJB2, GJB6, SLC26A4).
• Management: Hearing aids (by 1 month) → cochlear implant if severe-profound.
• 1-3-6: Screen by 1 month, diagnose by 3 months, intervene by 6 months.
• Prognosis: Excellent with early intervention; non-progressive.
• Lists risk factors for SNHL (genetic, CMV, ototoxic, perinatal)
• Recognizes role of CMV testing (negative in this case)
• Differentiates hearing aids vs cochlear implants
• Applies 1-3-6 EHDI guidelines
• Screens for syndromic associations (Usher, Pendred, Jervell & Lange-Nielsen)
• Discusses prognosis (excellent with early intervention)
📌 High-yield takeaway:
• GJB2 is the most common cause of autosomal recessive nonsyndromic SNHL.
• Diagnosis: Negative CMV + normal imaging + consanguinity → genetic testing.
• Management: Hearing aids (by 1 month) → cochlear implant if severe-profound.
• 1-3-6: Screen by 1 month, diagnose by 3 months, intervene by 6 months.
• Prognosis: Excellent with early intervention; non-progressive.
📋 Mock Test Feedback
💡 Examiner's note: Compare your answers with the model answers. In real TOACS, you would discuss these with the examiner.