⚕️ FCPS MCPS IMM MD Paediatrics TOACS · Mock Test

Barium Studies · 8-Minute Observed Station

📚 paeds.online
⏱️ TIME REMAINING
08:00
Barium enema showing coiled-spring sign in intussusception
A 2‑year‑old child presents with intermittent, severe, cramping abdominal pain
❓ Q1. Describe the radiographic findings. What is the most likely diagnosis?
Model Answer:
• Coiled-spring sign – contrast trapped between the intussusceptum and intussuscipiens.
• Filling defect in the colon (usually right colon/transverse colon).
• Meniscus sign – concave filling defect at the leading edge.
• Obstruction – contrast does not pass beyond the intussusception.
• Diagnosis: Ileocolic intussusception.
❓ Q2. What is the "coiled-spring sign" and why does it occur?
Model Answer:
• Coiled-spring sign: A classic radiographic appearance on barium enema in intussusception.
• Mechanism: The intussusceptum (telescoped segment) invaginates into the intussuscipiens (receiving segment). Barium is trapped in the narrow space between the two layers of bowel, creating a coiled, spiral appearance.
• Appearance: A helical or spiral pattern of contrast outlining the intussusception.
• Significance: It is pathognomonic for intussusception on barium enema.
• It indicates that the intussusception is present and the bowel layers are edematous, trapping the contrast.
❓ Q3. What is the classic clinical triad of intussusception?
Model Answer:
Classic triad (present in ~40-50% of cases):
1. Intermittent, severe, cramping abdominal pain – often paroxysmal, causing the child to draw up knees and cry.
2. Vomiting – initially non-bilious, may become bilious as obstruction progresses.
3. Passage of currant jelly stool – blood and mucus mixed with stool (due to venous congestion and mucosal sloughing).
Other features:
- Palpable sausage-shaped mass in the right upper quadrant.
- Lethargy disproportionate to abdominal findings.
- Young child (peak age 5-36 months).
❓ Q4. What is the pathophysiology of intussusception? What are "lead points"?
Model Answer:
• Pathophysiology: One segment of bowel (intussusceptum) telescopes into an adjacent segment (intussuscipiens), causing bowel obstruction and vascular compromise.
• Venous congestion → edema → ischemia → necrosis → perforation (if untreated).
Lead points – abnormal structures that serve as a focal point for the intussusception:
- Idiopathic (most common in 6-36 months): No identifiable lead point (likely due to lymphoid hyperplasia).
- Pathologic lead points (5-10%): Meckel diverticulum, intestinal polyp, lymphoma, duplication cyst, Henoch-Schönlein purpura, cystic fibrosis, post-surgical.
- In older children (>3 years): Higher likelihood of a pathologic lead point.
❓ Q5. What is the first-line imaging modality for diagnosing intussusception?
Model Answer:
Ultrasound is the first-line imaging modality for diagnosing intussusception.
Findings on ultrasound:
- Target sign (doughnut sign): On transverse view – concentric hyperechoic and hypoechoic rings representing the edematous bowel layers.
- Pseudokidney sign: On longitudinal view – resembles a kidney with a central echogenic core (mesentery) and hypoechoic rim (edematous bowel).
- Absence of blood flow: On Doppler – indicates ischemia.
Advantages: No radiation, high sensitivity (>95%), and can identify lead points.
Barium enema/air enema: Both diagnostic and therapeutic (reduction).
❓ Q6. What is the preferred method for reducing an intussusception?
Model Answer:
Air enema (pneumatic reduction) is the preferred method for reducing intussusception.
Success rate: 80-95% (when performed within 24 hours of symptoms).
Procedure: Air is insufflated into the colon under fluoroscopic guidance. The pressure pushes the intussusception back into normal position.
Contraindications:
- Peritonitis or signs of perforation.
- Shock or hemodynamic instability.
- >24-48 hours of symptoms (increased risk of bowel ischemia).
- Bowel obstruction with free air or pneumoperitoneum.
Alternative: Hydrostatic reduction with saline or barium (less commonly used now).
❓ Q7. What are the criteria for successful air enema reduction?
Model Answer:
Radiographic criteria for success:
1. Free flow of air into the small bowel (visualized on fluoroscopy).
2. Disappearance of the filling defect – the intussusception is no longer visible.
3. Air fills the terminal ileum – indicates complete reduction.
Clinical criteria:
- Improvement in the child's condition – less pain, less irritability.
- Passage of stool or flatus.
- Resolution of abdominal mass.
If unsuccessful: Consider repeat attempt (max 2-3 attempts) or proceed to surgery.
❓ Q8. What are the indications for surgical intervention in intussusception?
Model Answer:
Absolute indications:
1. Peritonitis – signs of perforation or peritoneal irritation.
2. Free air on abdominal X-ray – indicates perforation.
3. Hemodynamic instability – shock, sepsis.
4. Pneumoperitoneum – free intraperitoneal air.
Relative indications:
1. Failed air enema reduction – after 2-3 attempts.
2. Recurrent intussusception – may indicate a lead point.
3. Suspected pathologic lead point – Meckel diverticulum, polyp, lymphoma (especially in older children).
4. Strangulated bowel – signs of bowel necrosis (sepsis, severe acidosis).
Procedure: Laparotomy with manual reduction (± resection if necrotic).
❓ Q9. A 2-year-old child with intussusception undergoes successful air enema reduction. What is the post-reduction management?
Model Answer:
Observation: Admit for 24-48 hours of observation.
Hydration: IV fluids until the child tolerates oral intake.
Feeding: Start with clear liquids, then advance as tolerated.
Monitor for recurrence: Up to 10% recurrence (most within 72 hours). Watch for recurrence of pain, vomiting, or currant jelly stool.
Pain management: As needed.
Discharge: When tolerating oral diet, pain-free, and no recurrence.
Follow-up: If recurrence occurs, consider repeating air enema or evaluating for a lead point.
❓ Q10. What is the recurrence rate of intussusception after air enema reduction?
Model Answer:
• Recurrence rate: 5-10% after successful air enema reduction.
• Most recurrences occur within 72 hours after reduction.
Risk factors for recurrence:
- Presence of a pathologic lead point (Meckel, polyp).
- Older age (>3 years).
- History of recurrent intussusception.
- Delayed reduction (>48 hours).
If recurrence occurs:
- Consider repeating air enema (if no contraindications).
- Evaluate for lead point (ultrasound, CT, or laparoscopy).
- Surgery may be indicated for recurrent cases.
❓ Q11. A 4-year-old child with intussusception has failed two attempts at air enema reduction. What is the next step?
Model Answer:
• This is a failed reduction – requires surgical intervention.
Next step: Laparotomy with manual reduction.
Procedure:
1. Manual reduction – gently milk the intussusception back.
2. If the bowel is viable and reducible → perform reduction only.
3. If the bowel is non-viable (necrotic, perforated) → perform resection and anastomosis.
4. Inspect for a lead point (Meckel diverticulum, polyp, duplication cyst) and remove it if found.
5. Post-operatively: IV fluids, antibiotics (if resection), and monitor for complications.
❓ Q12. A child with intussusception presents with lethargy, sepsis, and a distended, tender abdomen. Air enema is contraindicated. What is the diagnosis and management?
Model Answer:
• This is a complicated intussusception with bowel ischemia or perforation.
Diagnosis: Peritonitis, sepsis, or bowel necrosis.
Management:
1. Emergent surgery – laparotomy.
2. IV fluids and antibiotics (covering Gram-negative and anaerobic organisms).
3. Resection of non-viable bowel with primary anastomosis (or stoma if unstable).
4. Post-operative ICU care.
5. Monitor for complications: anastomotic leak, wound infection, sepsis.
⚠️ Key concept: The coiled‑spring sign on barium enema is a classic finding of intussusception. Air enema (pneumatic reduction) is the preferred diagnostic and therapeutic procedure, with a success rate of 80‑95%. Contraindications include peritonitis, perforation, and shock.